Why did the Big Three after WWI disagree so strongly?

After four long and difficult years for e precise last(predicate) touch, demesne war 1 was offici ally declared all over in October 1918. The tide had turned against the Axis, and Germany had lost the war. The end caused by orb War 1 was enormous, with France bearing the brunt of it. All told, 17 trillion civilians and soldiers died, with 300,000 homes, 6,000 factories and 1,000 miles of railroad destroyed. Much of the damage was in France, and the address of the devastation was inconceivable. To alleviate the distress at the end of the war, the countries involved refractory to have a conference where the blame for the war would be placed on Germany, with iii main hands playacting as the ringleaders at the conference deciding Germanys consequences. These three men, Georges Clemenceau, doubting Thomas Woodrow Wilson, and David Lloyd George were the leaders of the Versailles conference, further each had very different views on the war and varying ideas on how better to punish Germany, and were called the long Three. Georges Clemenceau, (better known as The tiger) Prime minister of religion of France, wished to see Germany pay for all the damage and take dear blame for the entire war. His views on the war were quite extreme, increase by his strong abominate for the Germans and their policies on world diplomacy.

all differing from Clemenceau was Wilson, President of the United States of America. He believed that a gentle rally to Germany would suffice, and that all countries should take touch off in rebuilding europium without placing the blame solely on Germany. Wilsons and Clemenceaus views on Germany and World War 1 were on totally different en ds on the spectrum, but the man who acted as! the jobber was David Lloyd George, Prime Minister of the U.K, and a very shrewd diplomat. He believed... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.